Search
Climate change, explained clearlyFriday, October 23, 2026
Climate Tech

Solar-assisted CO2 heat pump shows 18.7% COP gain with rising irradiance

Italian researchers find solar-assisted CO2 heat pump improves heating capacity 21% and COP 18.7% as irradiance rises, but economic payback varies widely by climate.

Ecoverse graphic with the headline: Solar-assisted CO2 heat pump test rig in Rome

Key takeaways

  • COP rises 18.7% as irradiance climbs from 322 to 904 W/m²
  • Heating capacity increases 21.1% in solar mode
  • Annual electricity savings from source-switching are only 100–120 kWh
  • Payback varies from 6–10 years (high sun) to 20+ years (low sun)
In this article
  1. How does irradiance affect CO2 heat pump performance?
  2. What are the economic implications across different climates?
  3. Ecoverse analysis

Italian researchers have demonstrated that a solar-assisted CO2 heat pump can increase its coefficient of performance by 18.7% when solar irradiance rises from 322 to 904 W/m².

How does irradiance affect CO2 heat pump performance?

A team at the University of Naples Federico II and ENEA tested a 10 kW dual-source prototype at a Rome research center. The unit switches between an air evaporator and ten south-facing photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) collectors tilted at 48 degrees. In solar mode, CO2 flows through copper tubes bonded to the rear of the PVT array, while a 300-litre tank simulates domestic hot water demand at 20–60 °C.

Across 143 solar-mode tests, raising irradiance lifted the refrigerant evaporation temperature from 4 °C to 12.9 °C. That cut compression work, boosting heating capacity 21.1% (8.75 kW to 10.6 kW) and COP 18.7%. Below a minimum irradiance threshold, however, air-mode remained more efficient because the air evaporator has lower thermal resistance.

What are the economic implications across different climates?

The researchers trained artificial neural networks to predict electricity use, COP and compressor frequency, then ran annual simulations for seven cities — Rome, Tenerife, San Diego, Toronto, Mexico City, Perth and Beijing — using five hot-water profiles and a 900-litre store. Source-switching saved only 100–120 kWh of electricity per year in the best cases. The dominant economic driver was the PVT field’s own electricity generation. Simple payback ranged from 6–10 years in high-sun locations to over 20 years where solar resource is weaker.

Ecoverse analysis

The 18.7% COP improvement corresponds to a rise from roughly 3.2 to 3.8 (assuming a typical baseline CO2 heat pump COP near 3.2 at 4 °C evaporation). That gain is meaningful for domestic hot water, but the modest switching savings highlight that PVT electricity output, not thermal COP alone, determines project viability.

Read the full study. For more on solar payback calculations, see How does a solar panel system pay for itself?.

Frequently asked questions

What refrigerant does the tested heat pump use?

The prototype uses CO2 (R-744) as its refrigerant.

At what irradiance does solar mode become better than air mode?

The study identifies a minimum irradiance threshold above which Sun-Mode outperforms Air-Mode, but does not state the exact value in the public summary.

How many test points were collected in each mode?

164 test points in air mode and 143 in solar mode.

Sources

  1. Solar-assisted CO₂ heat pump achieves 18.7% COP increase as irradiance rises · pv magazine · 2026-10-22

Educational content, not financial advice. Some links may earn us a commission; see our affiliate disclosure and editorial policy.

Ecoverse
Independent, plain-language coverage of climate change, energy, transport and the money behind it. About Ecoverse